Talk:360 v. Tencent

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2021 and 14 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EdisonCMN2160.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Other companies involved
Baidu and several other companies declared they aren't going to be compatible with 360.

Someone should probably talk about that...

http://www.china-online-marketing.com/news/kingsoft-baidu-keniu-and-maxthon-appeal-to-boycott-360/

Ogreenworld (talk) 08:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Ogreenworld

Biased language
This article doesn't seem particularly neutral. I'm especially concerned about this line:

"By far, the Supreme Court's written judgment is the best and most professional, both judicially and technically, judicial judgment of its kind ever amongst all AML cases in China."
 * According to who?
 * The best, most professional ever of its kind amongst all cases? Whoever wrote this really wanted to hammer in that it's the best.
 * (Also, the sentence is constructed very oddly, but the whole article is written oddly. At least it's consistent.)

Best regards, Dinsfire24 (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)