Talk:36th Engineer Brigade (United States)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The third external link ("Lineage & Honors of the 36th") deadlinks for me.
 * In the lead, you say "command & control". Could this be "command and control", pretty please? *grin*
 * Lead, you say "brigade saw its role changed several times". Could this be "saw its role change"?  I think either way is correct, but the second is easier to understand and looks less odd in a first reading, IMO.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The last two sentences of the first paragraph of the "Organization" section need a ref.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Overall, a nice article - I can't believe it has two failed reviews in the past few months - bad luck there! I am putting the article on hold to allow you time to deal with a couple of minor MOS/prose things and one referencing issue. If you have any questions, let me know here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Easy enough. It's done now, thanks for the quick review! - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame)  19:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Everything looks great, so I am passing the article. Thanks for the quick response! Dana boomer (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)