Talk:370 Jay Street/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 19:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Opening statement
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use ✅,, , ❌, , or , followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. – ♠Vami _IV†♠  19:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Now for wrath

Pre-prose review

 * There are too many citations for a lot of the article. Four citations for a sentence is pushing it, but six tosses "it" into outer space.
 * ✅--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 23:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Prose
Can you address these three when you have a moment? This article is very close to passing. – ♠Vami _IV†♠  05:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * in post-World War II modernist style. the post-World War II modernist style.
 * ✅--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The design had originally been drafted prior to World War II;[7][10][11] it was originally envisioned as an Art Deco-style building. Two uses of "originally" in the same sentence.
 * ✅--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * anticipation of unification of the transit system, the unification.
 * ✅--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

GA progress
Article passes CopyVio scanner. Images are all relevant and tagged/free. References are credible. – ♠Vami _IV†♠  00:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)