Talk:370th Infantry Regiment (United States)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on 370th Infantry Regiment (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070815195547/http://www.ci.chi.il.us:80/Landmarks/E/EighthRegiment.html to http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/E/EighthRegiment.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 370th Infantry Regiment (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/E/EighthRegiment.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410125837/http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/V/Victory.html to http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/V/Victory.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Uniqueness of black officers
The intro says that the 370th was the only US Army combat unit in WW1 to have black officers; this seems to me that it would have to be incorrect, as, for instance, the 369th Infantry Regiment also had black officers. In the body of the article, the more specific claim that it was the only unit commanded entirely by black officers is made (cited to a twenty-first-century press release by the Illinois National Guard), which seems more possible to me, though I don't have the knowledge to say one way or the other. Anyone have the sources to make sure the article's statements are all verifiable? Binabik80 (talk) 17:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)