Talk:3rd Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * :: Red hyperlinks appear in article. Text is also overlapping images in the History section of article. Both need fixing.
 * Removed the red links. I think I have also fixed the problem with the text, no further problem is showing up on my screen. — Ed! (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * :: make sure disputes are resolved in editing of article.
 * The discussion moved to my talk page, where the other user is no longer discussing the issue or editing the article, as far as I can see. — Ed! (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well done on your GA pass. — Pr3st0n (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I have responded to all of your points. Thank you for your review. — Ed! (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well done on your GA pass. — Pr3st0n (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I have responded to all of your points. Thank you for your review. — Ed! (talk) 00:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)