Talk:4

Judeo-Christian symbolism
The article currently has a section titled "Judeo-Christian symbolism". This is a problem because they are separate religions, and even where they share scripture they interpret it differently. (Additionally, they are not the only religions to treat the Hebrew bible as a part of the scripture.) Looking at the entries in this, it looks as though it could be sensibly divided into two separate sections: "Bible" and "Judaism". -- Nat Gertler (talk) 23:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Should the index in a sequence be considered a mathematical object worthy of including in number articles?
Esp. in guidance of nice/core/etc. properties in OEIS. Radlrb (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Certes, you mentioned "No. Consensus at Talk:2 is that such facts are about pi, not the integer." as your reasoning in your recent revision that undid my edit, where I noted "The unit (1) is the fourth distinct entry in the continued fraction for pi π ), by order of appearances of entries." This is about 1 as an integer within a sequence descriptive of pi (unrelated to a base-specific property) in a continued fraction *where 4 is its index in the sequence (also an integer; generally in sequences, indexes usually will carry integer values, outside of functions with varying ranges and domains, and the like) Radlrb (talk) 21:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)*. Check for something that makes sense, somewhat, in that sequence after a quick look? The product of the first two distinct entries in [the] continued fraction for pi is 21, where the 42nd (42 = 21 x 2) indexed member is quite special in this sequence: 20776, a value that is not superseded until the 350th indexed new entry (specifically 78629, where 350 is near-triangular, as the sum of the digits [2, 26])), which does not appear for quite some time (comparatively, not in several powers of 10 terms in the continued fraction for pi ). There are other things: 14 (7 x 2) is the seventh new entry, and 42 (14 x 3) is the 23rd, where 20776 is the 431st term in the continued fraction, with 431 the 83rd prime number and 23rd super-prime (also, 20776 has twenty-four (12 x 2) divisors, and the sum of its prime factors is 73, the 21st prime number). Radlrb (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I think the answer to your question in the thread topic is "Obviously not." - at least if I understand it correctly. I cannot make any useful sense out of the rest of what you have written, but I hope others will give their opinions too. Imaginatorium (talk) 06:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, at least explain then, why you think not. Radlrb (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC) And maybe also how you are interpreting the question, and so forth. Radlrb (talk) 06:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)