Talk:4-12-2

Merge
I suggest merging this with 4-12-2, since this was the only class of 4-12-2 locomotives. In addition, 4-12-2 goes into more detail. Expanding this one would essentially result in two identical articles with different names. The question becomes which title to use. Hellbus (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, the best solution would be to turn this article into a redirect for 4-12-2 I dont see any substantial content here, that isn't already there. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Concur --BenBurch (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In spite of the recent additions to this article, I still recommend a merge to 4-12-2. There is no need to have 2 competing articles on the same subject. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merged. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  03:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)