Talk:4000 A.D.

GNG
I am pinging the article's creator on the GNG. I probably won't be taking this to AfD, as there are three refs that I think are reliable, but I think that in here there's one ref counting towards GNG (ref 1- it says it has three pages from 7 to 9), and the other one (which I added to Reception) is a capsule one that isn't significant. The other review is from a reliable book, but I am unsure on whether the review is long enough to be significant. If possible, could editors who have the first ref (magazine) or the book transclude the content to the article if the book (The Complete Book of Wargames) is long enough to count towards GNG? Many thanks for your time with this article! VickKiang (talk) 05:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I think User:Guinness323 has access to that book. BOZ (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added a review from TCBoW, and fixed the citation template for the Games magazine entry. Obviously this article also needs some detail, which I will provide after I take the dog for a walk.Guinness323 (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * P.S. I wasn't aware of this Games article, thanks for bringing it to my attention, lost of great reviews of various games there! Guinness323 (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. ;) BOZ (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your improvements, the article definitely meets GNG, my issues were addressed. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)