Talk:40 principles of invention

Untitled
Hello, this is my first comment in English. The definition of the so called "40 principles of invention" though it would seem to be brief and concise, actually is incorrect. THAT means, that 40 principles of invention are not idempotent with 39 or 40 parameters, defined originally by Altshuller, in TRIZ methogology of invention process, for overcomming technical contradictions.

I mean, firstly, one should define main, relevant some technical contradiction for an object, or even whole system - being analysed, in order to optimize one or more of its parameters. Secondly, crossing column, and row, pointed out by/regarding first, and the second parameters in the defined contradiction, respectively, one can read oder numbers of the suggested,subsequent principles of innovation (ordered in descending sequence for their probability of statistically estimated success in seeking of ideal solution for the aimed problem), placed within single cell, a cell - pointed out within Table of Contradiction.

Therefore, there are some connection of usefullness and functionality between a) Table of Contradictions, b) 40 principles of invention, and c) the defined 39, or 40 categories of parameters, but NOT in a way presented currently within subject "40 principles of invention", on English Wikipedia FotoSceptyk (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)