Talk:444th Air Expeditionary Wing

Questions and contradictions
I have just finished copyediting this article, but a few things still stand out:

In '1945': "It received a DUC for attacking oil storage facilities at Oshima" and later in the same paragraph: "receiving another DUC for this action" What is a DUC? I think it means 'Distinguished Unit Citation', but as it turns up without introduction or explanation, I would rather be sure before I or anyone else adds it.
 * That's what it is. It's now spelled out in the infobox --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

'Postwar', para 1: "Demobilization was in full swing and the group turned in its aircraft and was inactivated on 1 October 1946" 'Postwar', para 2: "Demobilization meant that the group turned in its aircraft and was inactivated on 31 March 1946" The statements seem to contradict each other.
 * ✅ They sure do. All references to the group turning in its planes have been removed. (it didn't, the planes were transferred to another group).--Lineagegeek (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I may be missing something, so somebody with the expertise (or the sources), might well want to fix this situation.

RASAM (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Location of modifications
The article indicates that modifications to the B-29s in 1944 were performed elsewhere. However would seem to indicate civilian workers were hired to perform the modifications at Great Bend. Which is it?--Lineagegeek (talk) 16:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

GWOT
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mohammedzatar/?originalSubdomain=jo Buckshot06 (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)