Talk:48th (Northamptonshire) Regiment of Foot

Untitled
A tag has been placed on 48th Regiment of Foot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

This is an historical regiment similar to others with similar articles on Wikipedia. It does need to be expanded on which will be done. It is also has links to other pages like: "List of British Army regiments (1881)" Mcgady@earthlink.net 22:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/048-751.htm
 * In George Byng, 3rd Viscount Torrington on 2011-03-19 21:19:08, 404 Not Found
 * In 48th (Northamptonshire) Regiment of Foot on 2011-06-19 14:03:35, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 14:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Nicknames
In the section on Nicknames, the following: "Murray's Bucks", "The Surprisers", "Lacedemonians".

were in fact associated with the 46th Regiment

Not encouraging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JF42 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 2 October 2011 (UTC)