Talk:4 Pak All Action

Untitled
In this cases this is not spam. Note the "gameid=18259". Most likely this points to a different page than what has been blacklisted, but I don't know I can't read the discussion about this so called "administrative action". I believe this subject may not be notable for its own article (hence the proposed merger) as there are very few references to the subject. The references given do indeed appear to be reliable third party sources.R00m c (talk) 03:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * HU12 is an administrator. It was an administrative action, he's removing all links to digitpress.com per findings at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam.  You do not decide what is spam and what is not, and I would advise not violating 3RR putting back references to a blacklisted site. --Marty Goldberg (talk) 03:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * By looking at the diff there is no way to tell if some one is admin or not. So it does not matter if he/she is an admin or not. I know that I added the link and my intention was not to spam it. I found it as a good resource about this subject(per google), a subject that was unreferenced before. Thanks for offering Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam. I have no clue were the discussion is and where it was voted that we black list every page(no matter how useful) just because of some other editors bad edits. But maybe I am just missing it? I see only one mention of the word digitpress under Blacklist? but then just a bunch of deleted pages or something.


 * From Spam:
 * Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed.


 * I am not adding this link to the article for the purpose of promoting a website or a product. I am simply offer Verifiability one of Wikipedia's core content policies.


 * Some times it is a good idea to assume good faith a fundamental principle on Wikipedia.
 * R00m c (talk) 04:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Nobody was calling your edit anything but a good faith edit. It wasn't even addressed to you - maybe that's where your confusion is.  The title of spam was in reference to the site itself.  The entire domain is being blacklisted because of some recent spamming of that site by another user.  Hence, all references and links to that site are being removed by Hu12. Again, to clarify, nobody is calling you a spammer.  --Marty Goldberg (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clarify that.R00m c (talk) 04:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, and by all means, please keep building this article up. It needs it. :)  --Marty Goldberg (talk) 04:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)