Talk:4th Force Reconnaissance Company/Archive 1

Drunk Military
your edit was reverted because you did not provide a reliable source to support. Saying "I was there" doesn't count, it's considered original research. - wolf  18:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC) your edits, both to this page and United States Marine Corps Force Reconnaissance have a again been reverted because you have failed to produce a source to support to them. Saying "I was there" or "I'm in the unit" is not acceptable as support as it's considered original research. Repeatedly making the same unsupported edits while also refusing to engage on article talk pages is considered disruptive editing. - wolf  22:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Concur with Thewolfchild. Include a reliable source for a claim of reflagging the unit. Lack of reliable sources could get the entire article pulled. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

has again reverted in his unsourced changes to this article and Force Recon, all which are accompanied by the same edit summary; "thewolfchild is being unreasonable. He using wiki procedures over common sense. Why would people benefit from deactivating a unit.". It's a fairly simple rule, but one that every user must abide by, for every edit; all content must be sourced. WP does not allow original research. While continually edit warring and disrupting, he has refused to discuss, or even acknowledge attempts to discuss, though he has already demonstrated his ability to use a talk page. - wolf  05:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)