Talk:4th Parachute Brigade (United Kingdom)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The article is well written and follows a good layout.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * References are well used.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article maintains a neutral point of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * The article does not appear to be subject to any edit warring.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are well used and in the public domain.
 * 1) Overall: A very good read and very interesting. Harrison49 (talk) 19:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail: