Talk:500 Brickell

Why this article should not be deleted
These skyscrapers meet notability requirements. They are a part of the ongoing Miami Manhattanization wave. The information presented is all objective evidence, and is supported with 3 references and 2 external links. The topic is covered well with all relevant infomation that has been released for the skyscrapers. It also includes an image that even more clearly depicts the topic. The article satisfies WP:NOTE requirements, and therefore should not be deleted. Raime 02:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brickell Station.jpg
Image:Brickell Station.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: I have fixed the fair use rationale so that it now qualifies for use in this article. Rai - me  06:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)