Talk:501(h) election/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LuisVilla (talk · contribs) 05:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review! I've made the requested changes.  Although for a topic like this, I'd think it's actually more reliable to cite the IRS directly for basic factual information, since secondary sources may make mistakes or misinterpret the regulations. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm OK with citing both the IRS source and a secondary source (it's always useful to have a primary source available!), it's just helpful if we're not the ones interpreting it. Does that distinction make sense? (I'm pretty sure there is an essay on that somewhere, but heck if I can find it...)—Luis (talk) 04:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)