Talk:525 Lexington Avenue/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zippybonzo (talk · contribs) 06:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

No tags or major issues I can find from a first glance, seems pretty good for all the criteria, but I'll get reviewing. (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:


 * Thanks for taking on this review. I appreciate it. Please feel free to point out any issues with the article, even if they're minor typos; I'll be glad to fix them. Epicgenius (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Epicgenius, It’s pretty much a perfect article, today and tomorrow I will deal with the last few checks, but from what I have done so far, it’s likely a GA, if I see anything, I’ll let you know. Zippybonzo &#124; Talk (he&#124;him) 18:24, 23 June 2023 (UTC)