Talk:53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division

Untitled
Could someone please move the World War One history to another article, to make room for a new article on the 2nd World War 53rd Welsh Division? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tomdidiot (talk • contribs) 17:12 UTC, May 28, 2006 (UTC)
 * This article, though only addressing World War I, can be expanded to include the World War II information. No need for a second article. &mdash;ERcheck @ 22:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I've added a places within the article for WW2 info. Please expand with information that you have on WW2. &mdash;ERcheck @ 22:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Requested move
move. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 01:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division (United Kingdom) → 53rd (Welsh) Infantry Division — United Kingdom as disambigutor unnecessary —GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support as per Graeme Leggett. Buckshot06(prof) 09:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per Graeme; after having reviewed the WP:MILMOS, there's no need for the disambiguator. Parsecboy (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

From my understanding, WP:MILHIST naming conventions always include the country, even in cases like 517th Parachute Infantry Regiment (United States) and 101st Airborne Division (United States) where no such wankers or disambiguators are needed. However, I don't particularly see the use for it myself. Parsecboy (talk) 19:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * They do not. Clearly understood that when it's a unique title, no disambiguation is necessary. Buckshot06(prof) 09:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)