Talk:64,079

What does this mean?
The article says, "64079 is the smallest extra strong Lucas pseudoprime to base 2"

Is this true?

First, 64079 is not a pseudoprime to base 2.

Second, by what algorithm is 64079 an extra strong Lucas pseudoprime, or even a Lucas pseudoprime?

If this claim cannot be justified, it should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathPerson (talk • contribs) 15:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)