Talk:69 (sex position)

Image
Wikipedia is open to the general public, which includes all ages. Wouldn't it make more sense to remove a picture and this inappropriate article by extension? One: this picture is too unacceptable. Two: did it have to be ion color? Couldn't they have used a black-and-white image with such low quality that nobody can understand what's going on? Three: encyclopedias don't normally have pictures. I mean, this is just too much. Pictures of guillotines are fine because they aren't in use. But this? Come on, Wikipedia admins, did you have to allow this picture? If you must keep it, at least replace it with an image what makes it harder to tell what is going on.Primal Groudon (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Primal Groudon, see WP:Not censored and Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * But still, the image violates North Korean law. Primal Groudon (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless you're one of the Kim family, no one in North Korea has internet. MightyArms (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Then don't look at it. 2604:2D80:DA01:CD00:F879:638:AD2B:805E (talk) 01:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021
93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

69 Le Parfum


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2021
93.188.100.22 (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.