Talk:7 Days (Craig David song)

Lyrics Section
Brilliant! Should probably be removed, but I can't bring myself to do it. :) mode_seven 14:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Totally agree! --Anshul 18:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I love literal lyric sections. "He thinks it's going to be a long, long time until touchdown bring him around again to discover that he no longer is the man at home. Instead, he is a 'rocket man.'" 24.3.194.185 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is hysterical. I hope no one removes it! --

Not a Nate Dogg sample. via @THEREALDJPREMIER "Actually that is Craig David imitating Nate Dogg on the intro hook....even Atlantic Records thought it was Nate..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.197.75.120 (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 5 April 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn. (closed by non-admin page mover) { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 23:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

7 Days (Craig David song) → 7 Days (song) – No other songs with this specific spelling have articles (7 Days (Adriana Evans song) is a redirect as of last year). QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 22:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose: "This specific spelling" seems like too small a detail to distinguish this from the Mary J. Blige song. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above; Seven Days (Mary J. Blige song) may be spelled differently, but I agree that the extra disambiguation is helpful. 162 etc. (talk) 04:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose unhelpful ambiguation. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above, ambiguous. Hatnotes to both articles are more useful. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah, looking at it again, the argument presented make perfect sense and I'm a bit silly for not having considered it. Withdrawn. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 22:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.