Talk:8th Missouri Infantry Regiment (Confederate)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 12:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

I can take this on over the coming days. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the delay on responding-- I got really busy over the past week. I'll comment soon -- Eddie891 Talk Work 13:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

That's prose for me, standard disclaimer about how it's mostly minor stuff, etc. Your prose gets better every time I read it, I swear. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * visually, the '1862' paragraph could be split
 * Split where I thought best, feel free to tweak if you disagree
 * ditto for the first of '1864-1865'
 * Split where I thought the most logical break was
 * " Battle of Fort Sumter; events in the state of Missouri led to an expansion of the war into that state" I don't think these are great bounded by a semicolon because 1) it's not immediately clear where Sumter is (to a passing reader) and 2) it's not clear when the war expanded into Missouri, would recommend clarifying both and splitting into two sentences
 * I've taken a crack at this, is this better?
 * " against the Red River campaign" our article refers to a 'Red River Campaign' with capital C
 * I think the Red River article is out of MOS. See Gettysburg campaign, Tullahoma campaign, Vicksburg campaign, and others.
 * "where the important" I don't think 'important' is needed here
 * Removed
 * "On October 27, the battalion," wants a year (Even though the year is in the subsection)
 * My instinct is that since this is a continuation of the formation narrative from the last paragraph of the previous section, this isn't needed. If you really think it is, I can add one.
 * "but Parsons right" I think you're missing an apostrophe here?
 * Good catch
 * "Mitchell's unit had taken 450 men into Prairie Grove; 20 of them became casaulties" seems to be a very roundabout way of saying "20 of the 450 men in Mitchell's unit became casualties" but I'm not positive my phrasing is better
 * I don't like beginning sentences with numbers, since there's great debate in some circles if it's okay to start with a numberal, and MOS:NUMERAL would want 20 here, not twenty. Thinking of a solution here
 * "Either way, Mitchell's regiment was given the designation of 8th Missouri Infantry Regiment on July 23, by the Confederate States War Department" I like "On July 23 the Confederate States War Department designated Mitchell's regiment as the 8th Missouri Infantry Regiment" better personally, but its really your choice here"
 * Went with something similar to your suggestion, tweaked to avoid close paraphrasing.
 * "Major General Frederick Steele" clarify whether he's Union or Confederate pls
 * Done
 * " but slid his army around the end of them" what does this mean?
 * Just stated outflanked, why I didn't write that in the first place, I don't know
 * " By the latter half of March" I think you want "later" or "second" though I guess latter isn't technically incorrect
 * Went with second. Stylistically, I would prefer latter, but since it's a bit of an odd construction here, I've changed it
 * "had lost all confidence" is all really needed here?
 * Nixed
 * "Some of the subordinate Union officers had lost all confidence in Banks earlier in the campaign, including one who briefly entertained ideas of a mutiny. This contributed to the Union decision to retreat" I'd suggest "The decision was in part because some of the subordinate Union officers had lost all confidence in Banks earlier in the campaign, including one who briefly entertained ideas of a mutiny." or something
 * How does "This decision was made in part because some of the subordinate Union officers had lost confidence in Banks earlier in the campaign; one had even briefly entertained ideas of a mutiny" sound?
 * Thanks for the review. I have one point I disagree with, and one where I'm still working on a minor change, but that's all so far I think.  I'm hoping to maybe take this one further than GA.  I recently got First Battle of Newtonia to FA-level, and I've got an open FAC at Featured article candidates/Landis' Missouri Battery/archive1.  The FAC experience has really helped me clean up my prose writing. Many thanks. Hog Farm Bacon 15:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Sources I checked lined up, images look good, article is comprehensive, no copyvio, etc. etc. Passing. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:01, 24 August 2020 (UTC)