Talk:9617 Grahamchapman

Comment
Is there a reason 9617-9622 have their own articles? Each article is identical, sans the name of the asteroid. Perhaps redirects to a single article about all six? --711groove 09:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Fair question, but there's no point in doing so. It doesn't hurt anything to have them, the Python connection makes it somewhat interesting, and combining them into one article would be more of a deviation from the Astronomy article conventions. (BTW, there is a slight difference in the Chapman article, due to the presence of a moon.) --Ckatz chat spy  10:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)