Talk:969 Movement

Misleading
The manner in which this group is treated here is misleadingly mild. They are part of an active genocide. Talking about if they are supremist/far-right/nationalist movement and so on is weak. The discussion of "nine special attributes" is overdone and is a red herring distracting the reader from the violent and bloody nature of this group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.223.98 (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Far-Right group?
Before anyone responds, I want to avoid any political arguments/discussions that will arise from this question, because I'm just wondering, so please try to answer the question instead of blowing it out of proportion. Is the 969 movement considered a "far-right" group? Because there has been many comparisons to it being a "supremacist" organization and an Islamophobic organization and a lot of news outlets show them sponsoring ethnic cleansing and hate speech towards muslims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.157.55.164 (talk) 02:23, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Ashin Wirathu
He is called Sayadaw Ashin Wirathu -

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2333858/Right-wing-Buddhist-leading-campaign-force-Muslims-Burma-says-wants-group-like-English-Defence-League.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312807/Burma-riots-Horrifying-moment-Buddhists-set-Muslim-man.html

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22023830

http://m.ibtimes.co.uk/saydaw-wirathu-myanmar-969-burma-450375.html

Official: https://facebook.com/ven.wirathumsy?id=100004005531662

Buddhist terrorism
The user has categorized this with the label "Buddhist terrorism". I'm not familiar with this organization but if my memory is correct this same user tagged the Bodu Bala Sena as a terrorist organization. May be this is also an incorrect tagging. I didn't go deep in the article but it is not mentioned so in the lead. --Lee (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Seems nobody is interested in this article anymore. According to wp:terrorist there need to be a widespread use of the term to label an organization as terrorists. I don't see that's the case here. So I will remove that label. --Lee (talk) 05:49, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed removal of the template Islamophobia
A politically charged WP:LABEL "Islamophobia" only reflect the opinion of some people. The inclusion of this side bar that is not neutral and misleading which violate the policy of Wikipedia. This is even banned for usage by formal media organizations including Associated Press. Therefore, here I propose that this be removed from this article. --125.34.139.112 (talk) 04:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * As it is describes as islamophobic by reliable sources it may be included. // Liftarn (talk) 09:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 969 Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130827232539/http://www.irrawaddy.org/archives/30965 to http://www.irrawaddy.org/archives/30965

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)