Talk:9th Engineer Battalion (United States)

Gallery and Fallen Soldiers
I came to this page from Category:Articles with incorrect citation syntax. In future, please do complete citations so that I and others don't have to clean-up after you.

But, my real point is that I don't think that §Fallen soldiers should be included in this article. Wikipedia is not a collection of all facts and, to be blunt, these fallen soldiers are just facts. Memories of them are best preserved elsewhere. Similarly, §Gallery has recently grown with the addition of images that may not be encyclopedic in nature. See WP:Galleries.

I propose to delete §Fallen soldiers (known).

—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

I oppose the deletion of the Fallen Soldiers section. History is a collection of facts, and Wikipedia works to collect the most important ones. The deaths, in combat, of each Soldier mentioned was reported in reputable and verifiable news sources around the United States and records pertaining to them are maintained in perpetuity by the Department of Defense. All but one of the known killed are from modern conflicts where the minimalization of US casualties has been a driving strategic paradigm (ex: see the development of the MRAP class of military vehicles). The listing of fallen Soldiers goes a tremendous distance in understanding the unit's contributions and service and thus should be kept in the article. That articles about other units do not include such information should, under no circumstances, be grounds for its removal. It only shows that the appropriate legwork of posting it has not yet been competed.WIKI1Q2W3E4R (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131029214842/http://www.cbsnews.com/2316-100_162-703078-30.html to http://www.cbsnews.com/2316-100_162-703078-30.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.9en.2bct.1id.army.mil/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:38, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 9th Engineer Battalion (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130402172025/http://www.eucom.mil/article/19889/u-s-army-europe-soldiers-units-garner-three-of-armys-five-top-engineer-awards to http://www.eucom.mil/article/19889/u-s-army-europe-soldiers-units-garner-three-of-armys-five-top-engineer-awards
 * Added tag to http://www.same.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=257&Itemid=83
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121229025600/http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=10329 to http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=10329

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)