Talk:A-2 (Michigan county highway)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 21:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I will review this soon.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   21:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * Add the length of highway in "Route description"
 * this was added already. What's the status of the review now?  Imzadi 1979  →   18:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , although I didn't find any other issue, I want to go for a 2nd opinion. If no one provides opinion by tomorrow, I will pass it.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   18:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I took a look at this article and expressed my views below. Will211  |Talk  02:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , thank you...  ❯❯❯  S A H A   02:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments by Will211
Other than these concerns, the article appears to be up to GA standards. Will211 |Talk  02:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * In the sentence "From this intersection, the county highway runs northward through forest between Lake Michigan and the freeway in northern Berrien County", you should probably mention that the freeway being referred to is Interstate 196.
 * "A-2 crosses into Van Buren County a short distance later..." how short?
 * two minor changes just applied.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , congrats, passed  ❯❯❯  S A H A   05:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)