Talk:A. N. Field

G.K. Chesterton, anti-semite?
This is a bit of stretch. Chestertons views were far more complex than Eric Blair's, at least according to his entry. Although he thought that there was a "Jewish problem," he was also invited by Zionists to speak on thier behalf, because his solution was a Jewish homeland. Hardly the attitude of anti-Semite. He also went on record opposing Hitler's actions... Was he an anti-semite, probably to a certain extent. Was he the sort that would have published the protocals of the elders of zion in England, NO. Could this be toned down for POV?

V. Joe 04:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

I've taken note of your objections and edited the A.N.Field entry accordingly. I hope it meets your approval.

User: Calibanu 09.25, 19 June 2006.

What is meant here?
In the middle of tweaking this article I came to the third to last par which says "However, Field never left New Zealand himself". That contradicts the previous part of the article? Is there a context I am missing here? Moriori 05:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Field as Ideological Influence
Field is viewed amongst the cited historian of the Australian far right as an ideological influence on that movement, but while his publications circulated in Australia and the United States, he never left New Zealand.

User: Calibanu: 12:12: 27 June 2006

_________

"accused of being a white supremacist, anti-Semite and neofascist." Field could not have been accused of being a neo-fascist, only a fascist;  neo-fascists came after his demise. --nt351, 2009 July 25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nt351 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 25 July 2009 (UTC)