Talk:A. R. Rahman: The Musical Storm/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 17:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'll take on this review. I will have it done in the coming days. Kind regards~ PinkElixir (talk) 17:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose, spelling, and grammar is of good quality. I made some wording edits to improve grammar and readability in reviewing the article. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * The article has both a References and Sources section, both of which contain WP:RS. URL's to sources lead to reliable news sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article covers the entire timeline of Mathai's research and writing process up until release and reception of the book. Is there any more detail you'd want to add to the Summary section? The other sections provide comprehensive coverage of those aspects, so perhaps fleshing out the Summary section would make it proportionate in size and detail to the others.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article follows WP:NPOV. The background and release section describes Mathai's challenges in contacting the author in a neutral manner. critical reception section highlights both negative and positive reviews without editorial bias.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The images used fall under either fair use or CC licenses.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Another solid article! Nice work! Cheers~ PinkElixir (talk) 21:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)