Talk:A1079 road

Merger proposal
It makes sense: keeping the articles together. Thoughts? --TFoxton 18:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Absolutely agree. Two articles, one piece of tarmac seems a waste of time. Regan123 18:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Beverley Road is a more than just a part of the A1079 - it's a community and distinct part of Hull. Keep the pages seperate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghr265 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Not beign a local its hard for me to eb sure, but this article seems to say the A1079 loses its primary status when it becomes Beverley Road. This suggests they are actually two pieces of tarmac that happen to connect to each other, rather than one being a subset of the other. I also can't see where Beverley Road could be included in this article - the focus of the article is not so much on the road itself (as this page is) but on the housing and shops that line it. On balance I'd argue they should remain separate though Beverley Road could do with better sourcing and a clearer claim to notability.


 * Any other views? Euryalus (talk) 01:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 06:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on A1079 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928011419/http://217.174.251.13/road_lookup?map_type=risk&country=GB&road=a1079 to http://217.174.251.13/road_lookup?map_type=risk&country=GB&road=a1079
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070802002641/http://217.174.251.13/library/pdfs/news/20070624_GB_Results_Table_1_2_final.pdf to http://217.174.251.13/library/pdfs/news/20070624_GB_Results_Table_1_2_final.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)