Talk:A4232 road/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

As best as I can tell, this article is close to being a Good Article. &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 01:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

GA Review response
Thanks Rob,

Hopefully I have addressed the problems;


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * Removed "basically" and entered non-breaking spaces for dates.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * All the references regarding the South Wales Echo do not have the author specified as they were all supplements in a series called "Cardiff Moving" and so did not list any authors/editors.
 * The section "It has always been intended that the short stretch from the Llanedeyrn Interchange to the Pontprennau Interchange on the A48 (Eastern Avenue) dual carriageway, be used to link the last two link roads of the PDR together." I cannot find any reference to it, therefore I have reworded the sentence to "The road between the Llanedeyrn Interchange to the Pontprennau Interchange on the A48 (Eastern Avenue) is also dual carriageway and there are no plans to renumber this section of the A48."...which hopefully is okay without a reference.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * I have removed "which do nothing to impress any visitor to the city."

Please let me know if I have not addressed your points correctly. I have requested a map (above), and I have also looked at other articles for someone who can create one, but Stratosphere is on an "indefinite wikibreak and has no estimated time of return". A map really would be great though. Seth Whales (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It would be hard without GIS data for England. Which may or may not exist. Looks good now, though. Thanks! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 19:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)