Talk:AARNet

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on AARNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150829215511/http://www.theage.com.au/ to http://www.theage.com.au/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:49, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AARNet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.aarnet.edu.au/library/aarnet_annual_report_2004.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203005029/http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Regulatory%20Reform%20and%20Carrier%20Infrastructure/Spreadsheet/Register%20of%20Licensed%20Carriers.XLSX to http://www.acma.gov.au/~/media/Regulatory%20Reform%20and%20Carrier%20Infrastructure/Spreadsheet/Register%20of%20Licensed%20Carriers.XLSX
 * Added tag to http://www.aarnet.edu.au/library/AARNetNationalMap_September_2013_Final.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131009194846/http://www.canarie.ca/en/about/partners/networks to http://www.canarie.ca/en/about/partners/networks

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Odd (sub)section titles/subtitles
The titles used in various places make the article sound like an 'advertisement' (for a lack of a better word), or like something you would find on an organization's own history page. E.g. "The early years – building the Internet in Australia", "The AARNet optical network grows", "Supporting big science". I think the sections, or at least their titles, should be revised. DpEpsilon (talk) 04:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree, they could be changed to just summarise the content of the respective sections rather than provide judgements. On the other hand, descriptions like "building the Internet in Australia" are not that far fetched. --Nemo 08:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)