Talk:ABA Journal

Retaliation Edits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Retaliation_by_Epeefleche_and_Stesmo This page has been targeted by users Epeefleche and Stesmo for retaliation after Law School Transparency was deemed a non-reliable source. They have attacked Brian Leiter's wikipedia page and the wikipedia pages of the University of Chicago, Philosophical Gourmet, The American Bar Association and Kirkland & Ellis: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophical_Gourmet_Report&type=revision&diff=663725919&oldid=642947761 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brian_Leiter&type=revision&diff=663826565&oldid=663635214 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Philosophical_Gourmet_Report&type=revision&diff=663712714&oldid=642947761 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ABA_Journal&type=revision&diff=663728099&oldid=643625305 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirkland_%26_Ellis&type=revision&diff=663728236&oldid=652907416 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brian_Leiter&type=revision&diff=663725721&oldid=663714656 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Chicago&type=revision&diff=663727449&oldid=662822725 This is a violation of Wikipedia's policies against retaliation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_repeated_arguments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sour_grapes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility Unemployed Northeastern (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Unemployed -- it is unethical of you, if you did this knowingly, to accuse me of editing a page that I did not edit. Which is obviously the case here. We assume good faith, but that it is a rebutable presumption. You are actively continuing to rebut it. Please do not, as you did above, spread blatant falsehoods. It is unethical if done knowingly, and negligent in the extreme if done unknowingly. Please edit ethically and with due care. (As to the removal of the ELs, they are in accord with the EL guidelines). Epeefleche (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, as indicated here, there is not -- as you assert -- any such consensus. For you to assert otherwise is again either unethical, or grossly negligent.  Since it accompanies the above grave mis-statement, my concern about your editing and your "good faith" increases. Epeefleche (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on ABA Journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/FAQ.HTML
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/home.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanet.org/journal/jan01/home.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708104100/http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/MEDIABUSINESS/70904006/1117/FREE to http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070904/MEDIABUSINESS/70904006/1117/FREE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)