Talk:ABC model of flower development

Class E
"In 2004 the characterization of sepallata1,2,3 triple mutant in Arabidopsis has led to the formulation of the ABCE model, which consider the importance of class E genes for the development of the floral organs."

Could somebody find the reference for this please, as it would greatly enhance this article, and I would personally be interested to read about it. Thank you. Zsingaya 10:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Lowercase?
Shouldn't the title of this page be "ABC model of flower development" rather than "ABC Model of Flower Development" per Naming conventions (capitalization)? Kingdon (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Haughn and Somerville
The ABC Model of flower development was first proposed by George Haughn and Chris Somerville in 1988. Genetic control of plant morphogenesis. Developmental genetics 9:73-89. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.191.56 (talk) 01:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Copy
Most of the intro has been copied to Plant development. --Ettrig (talk) 06:38, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The plant development article should have a summary of the content here, not a copy. This is the primary article on the subject of the ABC model. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm. The intro should be a summary. So what is the problem? --Ettrig (talk) 06:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * You mean, besides the copying without attribution to the source, your typos, and failure to summarize? --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I am not a mind reader, especially not when the target is at an unknown place probably far from me. So I answered about the problem that you thought you saw and commented, lack of summary. Since the intro should be a summary, copying the intro should result in putting in place a summary. If you don't think it is a proper summary, then you can of course improve it. But the problem you are then fixing is not mine. Splitting says attribution can be made in the edit summary. That is what I did. So neither do I understand your complaint about without attribution. --Ettrig (talk) 20:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)