Talk:ACM Transactions on Graphics

I think the impact section should be removed. First of all, it was never clear in the literature how to accurately measure the impact of a journal or a conference. Secondly, this specific ranking from citeseer seems very inaccurate. According to the referenced site [3], "this list is automatically generated and may contain errors" (and is also stopped generating in May 2003). Siggraph is now incorporated into TOG, thus this ranking does not hold anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.71.197 (talk) 01:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed the impact section as suggested; replaced with a brief mention of a more up-to-date ranking. — Miym (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)