Talk:AIMStar

Launch date (for expansion)
It seems that the launch date is more likely somewhere around the year 2037. I hope I am corect. Fbs. 13 19:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Launch date isn't specified by the (single) linked reference. I've rewritten the article text to cite a reference and to give more detail where possible (numbers given must come from references, as explained in WP:V). --Christopher Thomas 02:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Launch date is indefinite - it is not yet possible,according to both source articles. An exciting proposal, and one that might be realized, but nowhere in the medium term. Ottawakismet (talk) 16:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Is their any further information about AIMStar, or has it been combined into Project Orion ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.21.30.4 (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Not combined into Project Orion, just a project on the drawing board, that might be revisited if antimatter production makes it a viable option. Ottawakismet (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Project Orion is gone, cancelled, it no longer exists and never will. We may yet get nuclear pulsed propulsion, but it will be a derivation/advancement of Orion.178.15.151.163 (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on AIMStar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150423202610/http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/introduction.html to http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/introduction.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AIMStar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306065325/http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/Papers/NASA_anti.pdf to http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/papers/nasa_anti.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Fake table data
The linked paper contains a table with fake data (the DHe3 side being a near exact multiple of the DT side) compared to a bad scan from another source. This is also semi-confirmed by another NASA paper relating to the DHe3 side. I suggest to include the correct table in the article. Mightyname (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)