Talk:AK vs AK/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina wanna talk?
 * Thanks for stepping up! I hope I haven't caused any grief or bad blood, so to speak, because of our previous interaction. MSG17 (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * A reference is needed to verify that the film is 108 minutes.
 * Done and fixed the runtime
 * You can't cite Netflix. You need a reliable source.
 * Rechecked the sources in the article... found one that mentioned the runtime (now stated at the old amount, strange), changed to that


 * In the first paragraph, add a comma after Sonam Kapoor Ahuja.
 * Done
 * Link film-within-a-film.
 * Done
 * The claim that "Filming took place in December that year" seems misleading considering the note in #Production. I would reword it.
 * Reworded

Plot and cast

 * Since it's just trivial, remove the note after "documentary" in the first sentence.
 * Yeah, I don't think its ideal either. Done
 * Currently, the plot section is 754 words. Per WP:FILMPLOT, try to get it down to 700.
 * Managed to get it down to exactly 700
 * Remove the comma after "uninterested".'
 * Done
 * Remove the comma after "CCTV footage".
 * Done


 * The sentence "then would take a gun out from his bag and force Kapoor to kill either of themselves" is kinda confusing. Try rewording it.
 * Reworded
 * Add the cast listing template to #Cast.
 * Never knew about this template... done

Production

 * Are three references really needed after "his spokesperson"?
 * Eliminated one frivolous reference, now it's just the initial report and a later refutation
 * Is the quote after "early 2020, with Kapoor stating" necessary? Can it be changed to prose?
 * I would think that, for something like this, it would be best to hear it from the horse's mouth. (It helps that this quote was featured on DYK, so I am rather partial to keeping it.)
 * Thanks for the reason. Sounds good.


 * "under-the-radar" "under the radar"
 * Done
 * Link Twitter.
 * Done
 * In the note after "IAF officer", change "To be more specific" to "In the film".
 * Done

Soundtrack

 * "Weiting" "Writing"
 * Done
 * NDTV and Bollywood Hungama should not be in italics.
 * Done

Reception and analysis

 * Link Bollywood Hungama.
 * Its linked in the soundtrack section, so its not relinked to avoid repetition (same thing done with NDTV now).
 * NDTV and Bollywood Hungama should not be in italics.
 * Done
 * Move the first reference after "messaging" to after "Indian cinema',"
 * Done
 * "..." "[...]"
 * Done
 * Can "inside information on" be changed to just "inside information" or is it supposed to be part of the rest of the sentence it's in?
 * Its supposed to be part of the rest of the sentence (inside information on the main actors and Bollywood in general).
 * So can "information on and the reputations" be changed to "information on the reputations"?
 * I don't see why not. Done


 * Link the first use of Film Companion, not the second.
 * According to MOS:DUPLINK, "Citations stand alone in their usage, so there is no problem with repeating the same link in many citations within an article".
 * The first paragraph in this section has two uses of Film Companion. I was just saying to link the first one rather than the second one.
 * Oh...; sorry, I misread that. Fixed


 * "intentionally[...]the" "intentionally [...] the"
 * Fixed
 * "intentionally[...]" "intentionally [...]"
 * Done