Talk:AMSN

Closure endorsed; article may be re-created without a userspace draft. This DRV has no bearing on any future AfD for this article.

aMSN has been downloaded over 31 million times - http://sourceforge.net/top/topalltime.php?type=downloads May I propose we delete the articles for Notepad++, TortoiseSVN and Miranda IM while we're at it? mmGTi (talk) 22:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * They proposed them, Notepad++ two times. -- Cycl o pia talk  11:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * it was a joke because administrators have removed aMSN, but now it is restored ! — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 12:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is not a joke. It has been restored but it can be nominated again, and it probably will be if no sources come up. -- Cycl o pia talk  13:14, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * http://sourceforge.net/top/topalltime.php?type=downloads look the position and the number of download — Neustradamus ( ✉  ) 14:01, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I fully agree with you, but that's not how it works here. Or, better: I personally agree that if something has been used by millions of people it should be declared notable, and I see no problem with the article (I am very happy it is back). But a lot of people however disagree, and not necessarily with bad reasons. See WP:V, WP:N, WP:RS as primers. -- Cycl o pia talk  14:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I found some awesome new links! three very well known magazine ("Linux magazine", "PC magazine" and "The official Windows Magazine") that wrote an issue in which they had an article on aMSN! I will add those to the page! I hope this shows enough notability and that those people who disagree with you will find it notable now with these new links. And thanks for defending us and helping restore the page! :)
 * http://www.pcmag.co.uk/computeractive/downloads/2184171/amsn-messenger
 * http://www.officialwindowsmagazine.com/05582469247936575348/amsn-portable-msn-instant-messenger.html
 * http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/82/aMSN_in_Linux.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakarotoks (talk • contribs) 18:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The Linux Magazine one is very good. Thanks. -- Cycl o pia talk  18:39, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AMSN. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224065540/http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/82/aMSN_in_Linux.pdf to http://www.linux-magazine.com/w3/issue/82/aMSN_in_Linux.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926181636/http://www.unixmen.com/news-today/535-new-version-of-amsn-is-available-with-new-features to http://www.unixmen.com/news-today/535-new-version-of-amsn-is-available-with-new-features
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003081223/http://www.itavisen.no/290706/amsn-for-alle-plattformer to http://www.itavisen.no/290706/amsn-for-alle-plattformer

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:29, 24 June 2017 (UTC)