Talk:AP Statistics/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Great article! I hope to see further AP exam GAs. Just a few comments: Include the college board's stats about AP Stats, namely the grade distribution. The CB site also includes the breakdown of the four topics by percent of questions. This should be included. You may also want to make the time allotted, number of questions, etc. more prominant, as that is what most people will be looking for. Also, are there any textbooks that are most commonly used? Reywas92 Talk 18:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Thanks for taking the time to review this article. I'll add grade distribution data soon. I've added the topic breakdown to the Curriculum section; I hope that this is what you were looking for. A list of textbooks was provided at the bottom of the page. As for making exam info more prominent, I don't think that it would be appropriate to do so. Course content isn't any less important than the exam, and many students may be trying to figure out what's on the curriculum, rather than what's on the test. The point is: Wikipedians are supposed to cover all topics at an appropriate level and shouldn't decide what the readers should be focusing on.--Edge3 (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added the grade distributions to the Grading section. Is there anything else I need here?--Edge3 (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The grades look great, and I like how you put them all together. Would you mind also adding the number of students and schools to the past years? The textbooks are fine, but do you know if any of them are specifically for the AP curriculum or if one is used the most? Also, but only if you want, you could add a generic statistics image to the Course section. Reywas92 Talk  20:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added an image that's relevant to the course, and I'm thinking of adding more if the section ever expands into a detailed breakdown of the curriculum. The list of textbooks was already there before I began editing the article, but I didn't see its relevance back then. I know for a fact, though, that the textbook by Peck is made for the AP course, since it was my textbook last year. I won't be able to address the number of exam administrations right away, since I'm going on a college visit tomorrow. I'm actually thinking about adding a new table titled "Exam administrations" or "Number of examinees" (or whatever title you recommend) to the history section, as the growth in exam administrations is already discussed there. Unless you have any objections, I'll get started on that asap. --Edge3 (talk) 04:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added statistics on the number of students taking the exam, but I couldn't find data for 2001. Do you know where I might find it?--Edge3 (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I wouldn't know, and since you did great finding the others in book sources I won't hold you for it. There's always more that can be added to the article, but I will ✅ it as a GA! I hope to see you again at GAN. Reywas92 Talk  15:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Edge3. You reversed a deletion I made earlier today regarding the claim that the AP Stat course influenced the NCTM Standards on prob and stat, because there was a published source for that claim. I looked at the source, and I would argue that the claim they make is not correct. That is, the elevation of prob and stat as topics in the K-12 curriculum (not only the middle school by the way) first appeared in the 1989 Standards, not the 2000 Standards as the authors claim. And there was no huge differences between the way these topics were described in the 2000 Standards vs the 89 Standards. This isn't that important, really, but I would expect that most statistics educators who have played a role in the AP exam, the Standards, and the new GAISE report, would view this claim as untrue. The authors cited as a source of this claim are not part of this stat ed community, and a textbook is not ordinarily regarded as very reliable source. Respectfully, Srylesmor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srylesmor (talk • contribs) 03:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * First of all, let me begin by apologizing for the unilateral reversal of your deletion today. It would have been better to discuss the issue on the talk page first, and I admit that I made a mistake. The statement that I have now kept off the article, in my opinion, appears to comply with WP:V. Even though the source is a textbook, the authors are professionals in math education and probably know a lot about the development of math education throughout the years. However, you most likely know more that I do about the subject, so feel free to add information that you feel is relevant to the article. I'll be doing more of my own research into the topic as well so that we can hopefully come to a resolution over how this article should be written. Thanks for your contributions!--Edge3 (talk) 04:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've done more research into stats education, and I'm beginning to think that we might need a separate article (maybe Statistics education in the United States). A lot of the info I've found dealt with introductory statistics courses in general and weren't specifically written for the AP Stats course. Therefore, I think that the content in the History section is fine the way it is, and maybe we'll just have to start the new article.--Edge3 (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)