Talk:ASM-135 ASAT

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on ASM-135 ASAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070131173354/http://www.vought.com:80/heritage/products/html/asat.html to http://www.vought.com/heritage/products/html/asat.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080202163409/http://www.astronautix.com:80/stages/altair3.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/stages/altair3.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071204202633/http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/space_weapons/a-history-of-asat-programs.html to http://www.ucsusa.org/global_security/space_weapons/a-history-of-asat-programs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ASM-135 ASAT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080103174537/http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/bolorion.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/bolorion.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Development
A United States Army Nike Zeus missile armed with a nuclear warhead destroyed an orbiting satellite in May 1963. This does not look right. Sources talk about successful intercept (i.e. passing sufficiently close that a nuclear warhead would have destroyed the satellite), not actual destruction of satellite. See for example. JustSomePics (talk) 05:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Absolutely – since that source isn't entirely clear ("modified", "intercepted") I've adjusted the wording accordingly. --Zac67 (talk) 07:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)