Talk:A Best/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: IndianBio (talk · contribs) 22:46, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox
 * The Ayumi symbol should not be used in the infobox name of the album.
 * Avex Trax would do in the lead sentence, since Avex Creative is a part of that group.
 * after her 2002 studio album I Am... --> after her fourth studio album I Am... (2002)
 * The compilation was released in two formats different formats including a physical and a digital release --> The compilation was released in two different formats, having both a physical and a digital release.
 * Seven different artworks were released in several editions of the album. --> Multiple editions of the compilation featured different art works from one another.
 * A Best was appreciated by contemporary critics who noted the quality and memorability of the tracks. Many also labelled the album as one of the best representations of Japanese pop music --> Its best to add source to it, since nowadays it is being challenged per WP:SYNTH.
 * Give the year for Duty.
 * Since its release, the album brought Hamasaki a number of accolades and award nominations with a series of successful recognition throughout Eastern and Western publications. --> Over drawn, just simply say "A Best earned Hamasaki a number of accolades" and maybe link to List of awards received by Ayumi Hamasaki
 * Hamasaki will promote the re-release with a Japanese concert tour, entitled Made in Japan --> When?


 * Background
 * when she released her 2002 studio album I Am... --> Same as lead
 * Nearly every single from her three studio albums: A Song for ××, Loveppears (1999), and Duty appeared on the compilation album --> Why don't you use the years for all of them?

I am actually on the fence to go ahead with the review because, although you might have waited, I'm seeing issues in every sentence actually. :( Can you go for a GOCE? — I B  [ Poke ] 12:40, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging you . — I B  [ Poke ] 14:45, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi ; I think it will be best to finish/fail the article as it is. I have left this article in a dust since I listed it as an nomination for GA, and I have personally improved my writing and grammar since then and have contributed to other articles with more satisfying results. I'll probably re-write the article a bit more for a further nomination, but till then, I'll let you fail this one Nevertheless, thank you for the review. CaliforniaDreamsFan (talk &middot;&#32;contribs} 00:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your detailed explanation CDF. I'm sure this will be in a better state once you had another go at it, till then as requested, failing the article. Good luck on round two. — I B  [ Poke ] 08:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)