Talk:A Course in Miracles

Could use a content section
This article gives some background and a very basic explanation of what it is, but it lacks even a fundamental description of its content. 166.182.250.207 (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

What if the reason the article only gives the most basic outline of the Course is because no one really knows what it is talking about? For what if there is no reason or light in this darkness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.189 (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ACIM3COVER.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ACIM3COVER.jpg

Journalist
Matthew Remski passes WP:N. If you think he doesn't, this is not the place to argue that, instead you should submit his article for deletion. Do I like yoga? No, but it's a free country. People don't have to ask for my permission in order to practice yoga. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * What if, seeming to tell the truth, ACiM is a book of lies?


 * What if, appearing to heal, the book contains many harmful ideas?


 * What if, having promised to show the/a way - the Course sets out to mislead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.153.122 (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia isn't about WP:THETRUTH, but about WP:Verifiable information form reliable sources. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

A Course In Miracles
it is misleading to claim that this teaching " borrows from New Age ideas " There is no evidence of this at all. It is highly original in content. Of course those indoctrinated with familiar Christian dogma, are going to dismiss it, on entirely spurious grounds 80.189.60.71 (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The statement is sourced. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)