Talk:A Death in the Family (comics)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project
As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit WikiProject_Comics/Assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Minor numbers error in the polling scam
The guy who rigged the phone poll called every 90 seconds for 8 hours. 60 seconds x 60 minutes=3600 seconds in an hour. 3600 seconds divided by one call every 90 seconds is 40 calls an hour. 40 calls times 8 hours is 320 calls, at 50 cents a call or $160. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikedee429 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Goitta source or is that all your own work? - J Greb (talk) 21:36, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

It's just the math based on O'Neil's statement, if you dial a phone number every 90 seconds for 8 hours, you do it 320 times, not 200. The original wiki writer sorta crapped out on the math, that's all the correction was. It's not over 200 possible votes, it's over 300 possible votes, 320 to be exact, which is probably how it should be worded, citing "adding up to 320 possible votes to the death line"]. Thoughts?

JGreb, have we determined we want bad math in this article then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikedee429 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batman: A Death in the Family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110211052930/http://titanstower.com/source/whoswho/robin2.html to http://www.titanstower.com/source/whoswho/robin2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

May need a small update for Todd's modern characterization
I would add this myself if I was a reader of Todd's series, but I'm not. In Nightwing (2016)'s "2021 Annual" issue, Jason Todd guest stars and they make a point of saying he's trying to go completely legit. As a symbol of that, he now uses a crowbar as a standard weapon and is more open about talking about having "unresolved issues" over his relationship with Batman. In a seemingly productive way, not a snide way. Anyway, someone more familiar with where he's at should take a look at this article. A few sentences or a small, new paragraph ought to cover it. lethargilistic (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's more a Jason Todd factoid than a "Death in the Family" one, IMO. Maybe using a crowbar as his weapon would merit a mention here, but otherwise that's more about the character than this story. JOE BRO  64  01:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I can put what I was thinking more directly. Todd still brings DITF up all the time, and they've been drastically changing the way he does that. His resurrection has been reinterpreted as a second chance that is more important to Jason than the fact that he died in DITF. (On a whim, I just read "Red Hood and the Outlaws vol. 2 #50", and it is a crystal-clear example of this.) I think that reinterpretation of this storyline's fallout/significance is worth a mention in the "Effect on future stories" section. Suitably, Todd eventually re-joined Batman's supporting cast as an "on-again, off-again ally" strikes me as historically accurate (i.e., it can remain), but significantly out of date if it's true that he's now meant to be a straightforward ally. We agree that any potential mention of Jason's new crowbar speaks for itself. Obviously, this rough idea is OR and a secondary source would need to be sought out. I'm non-committal. I'm not in a position to suggest the exact change, but I think there's something there. lethargilistic (talk) 02:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)