Talk:A Genius Among Us (Recess episode)

Proposed deletion
Proposed deletion was removed due to reasons for its deletion no longer being valid. One of the two reasons was the page being an orphan - this is now not the case. This just leaves the stub reason and there are many stubs on Wikipedia awaiting development of which of course we do not delete them all as we require stubs to help us assist make them into larger pages. Also I expect this page to be rapidly developed in the future.

'''Please note : Production on this and related pages has been hindered recently by vandalism to pages in the Recess category. An act of vandalism was in fact the reason for this page being orphaned as the link was destroyed''' David 21:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Someone has added a prod template, with the reason for deletion being nn. I guess this was a try to insert the following template.



It is proposed that this

be deleted
 * This article is about a subject which may not be notable enough to be included on Wikipedia.

If you can address this concern by

please [ edit this page] and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced.

Nominator: Please consider notifying the [ author(s)] of this page using
 * notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~

I'm removing the tag, as the episode is definitely notable. --Orthologist 19:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * there seems to be some debate over notability, and the prod was added after discussion here that debated the idea, I have removed it for now pending further decision. SGGH 21:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)