Talk:A Line (RTD)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A Line (RTD). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/61dE4pl46?url=http://denverinfill.com/blog/2010/07/east-corridor-groundbreaking.html to http://denverinfill.com/blog/2010/07/east-corridor-groundbreaking.html
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/61dDvBaJE?url=http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/ to http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/eaglepcommuterrailpr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

University of Colorado Label
I think the article says clearly that the line is officially called the University of Colorado line for sponsorship reasons. In the interests of those unfamiliar with why the line is named as it is -- visitors and most residents -- the article should also say clearly that the train does not go to the University of Colorado. The title of the article reflects this and is appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.168.62 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC) to reply to me 14:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, didn't notice you commented here. Jc86035 (talk) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125;

Logo with "Clorado"
Having a logo .svg file at the top of the infobox that has an obvious typo in the word "Colorado" looks incredibly amateurish and the logo should not be readded to the page until it's corrected. I would do it myself but I don't have the image-editing skills. I've put a notice on the wikimedia commons page of the user who created the image but until it's fixed please don't re-add it to the page. --Jfruh (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree, and even without the typo, the logo does not appear to me to be a faithful reproduction of the logo, at least not as it appears on the A-Line home page. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 18:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC).

Route Description
The "Route" section of this article seems somewhat wordy. Would it make sense for me or another editor to rewrite it in a more consice manner? FoamingInDenver (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)