Talk:A Musical Joke

Sym. #21 ?
An earlier example (1772) for which he forget to attach a funny name: Symphony No. 21. It too is remarkably rough-sounding. When I hear it I suspect that someone managed to sneak it into the catalog after his death. Either that, or, even Mozart now and then fashioned a clinker. Twang (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I dunno. To me it seems stylistically reasonably Mozartian, although I'll agree that it's not quite as engaging as his twentieth. Therein lie the dangers of concluding a work's authenticity based solely on stylistic evidence! The autograph is extant (not signed, the title page contains the attribution to W. A. Mozart), so it's almost certainly Mozart's. Double sharp (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

What does "use of secondary dominants where subdominant chords are just fair" mean? Is "fair" a meaningful word to have here? It makes little sense to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuckeee (talk • contribs) 23:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * see fair Double sharp (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Music Notation
See this — Punetor i Rregullt5 (talk) 13:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Punetor i Rregullt5: See what? That link is of no use. Please compare what you entered here with the score at NMA: http://dme.mozarteum.at/DME/nma/nma_cont.php?vsep=167&gen=edition&l=1&p1=223 . Your score bears no resemblance to the the published score, so I ask you to remove it. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm so sorry, I'm a stupid, I have forgot to put the link. Click here. — Punetor i Rregullt5 (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Your score is nothing like the one you point to on YouTube. I'm going to remove it. Please don't add it again. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)