Talk:A Necessary Fiction

"Inaccuracies and errors" is a section I consider most illustrating, and I don't think it sustracts shine from the series. However, I have to point out that I think it is quite ridiculous to have such a copious section regarding the things that aren't factually right in the series, while lacking of a summary section which would have to constitute the most important part of the article. I think we should try to work on the actual episode before composing the "add-ons". --Espazolano 22:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The Hbo summary on this episode is pretty in depth though. BauerPower 01:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

I think it's great...But shouldn't someone summarize the episode in the article itself? --Espazolano 03:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

There are a lot of sites that have summaries of the episode. Also, the summary is only necessary for people who haven't seen the episode and don't intend to. The "Inaccuracies and errors" section seems to be unique these wiki pages. They contain most relevant information which people are looking for and cannot be found elsewhere. This information is allows people to sort though the fiction and reap the educational benefits from this series. Zanshin 10:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, I could not disagree more. The summary is useful for people who have acutally seen the episode, and should most certainly be included.  Showing only the "inaccuracies and errors" is incomplete, and the external links do not substitute for an actual article.  Magichands 00:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability
This article fails to assert notability for the episode in question. Consider adding a response section or a production section and gathering some third party sources about the episode.--Opark 77 10:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)