Talk:A Place with No Name/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I was a little worried about some of the prose, but I see that some recent ungrammatical additions have been removed.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All references check out OK
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Not applicable, no images used
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Although brief, this article is concise, well written, sourced and focussed. It provides an interesting addition to information about Jackson. I have no hesitation in passing it as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Although brief, this article is concise, well written, sourced and focussed. It provides an interesting addition to information about Jackson. I have no hesitation in passing it as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)