Talk:A Plague Tale: Innocence

Reviews in template
- I can let Screen Rant pass (which is probably reliable per discussion from projects other than WPVG. I am not sure). However, Windows Central is definitely not a "usual suspect" (why go against the guideline?) and its reliability is not discussed (then why risk using it?). AdrianGamer (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, but why is it a risk? If others agree with you about Windows Central, then we should move it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Sebastian James what's the T? 17:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You can start a discussion at WP:VG/RS's talk page, but there is the possibility that we consider it unreliable. If that is the case, then you may have the risk of introducing an unreliable source to an article, which certainly is not ideal. There are a lot of reliable sources giving this game a score and they are not mentioned here, so I don't see the need of you taking that risk by using a review from Windows Central. Stick to established reliable sources as much as you can (because most of them fulfill the criteria of "usual suspects" anyway). Only use situational or undiscussed source when it is necessary. AdrianGamer (talk) 17:54, 20 May 2019 (UTC)