Talk:A Spoonful of Sherman

Assessment
The writing in the intro has a strong, clear voice but the article overall could benefit from additions that address the relevance of such a short-run event in the public's ongoing interest in the work of the Sherman brothers. I would also be helpful to gloss them earlier in the lead, even if simply.

The section on critical reception in important, but should be re-written in prose that synthesizes the responses rather than presents them as a list. As is, it feels somewhat more promotional than objective.

Sources are numerous, but could be pared down according to reliability and repetition. Also, adding more info to the citations (article title, author publication, date, etc.) would be helpful to the reader and to the article's further development.

Also one question-- the lead lists the dates of the cabaret as being January 6 and 7, 2014, but the image included in the article reads April 15-22. Is this a second run? If so, that does increase notability and should be referenced.

Thank you for your contribution! ÇaCestCharabia (talk) 08:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)