Talk:A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant/Archive 1

Review

 * I know that there was at least one highly-critical review in a secondary source I saw somewhere but I can't seem to find it at the moment. If someone else does feel free to either put it here on the talk page, or add it to the Reviews section in the same formatting style as the others.  Smee 07:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC).

Removal of unsourced material

 * Prev edits by anon ip are confusing, and also not only removed sourced material from the article, but added unsourced material to the article. Please discuss here.  Smee 03:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

GA Review

 * 1) Well-written:
 * 2) Factually accurate:
 * 3) Broad:
 * 4) Neutrally written:
 * 5) Stable:
 * 6) Well-referenced:
 * 7) Images:

This article passes everything except for the reviews section, which is currently broken up into individual reviews is a listy format. The section should be prose paragraphs in one whole "reception" section, possible organized by critique than reviewer, though that's more optional. Also, the lead has too many redlinks, either de-link or wrote articles for the theaters. Message me on my talk page for a quick re-review at any time. --PresN 16:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I will implement all of the suggestions you have suggested, and message you soon for a re-review. Thank you for your time and helpful pointers!  Yours, Smee 17:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC).
 * Passed now --PresN 23:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

GA Pass
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,  T Rex  | talk  05:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 20:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)